Gross Misrepresentation [of the Jamie Han debate]: The Straits Times Intelligence Operatives Have Done It Again
full post of the article mentioned here
Below is the opening paragraph of the article (with emphasis mine, and comments in '[ ]' brackets mine as well):
Howw much, is thatt doooog-gie in the win dow? ("aow, aow!")
The one with the waaaag-gerly taillll!!!
Below is the opening paragraph of the article (with emphasis mine, and comments in '[ ]' brackets mine as well):
Today, I came across a Straits Times article on the fabled exchange at the Kent Ridge Ministerial Forum between MM Lee and Jamie Han. The Straits Times Article published excerpts of the proceedings without indicating what was omitted [how nice - so much for journalistic integrity], as shown in the segment below. I would like to reproduce the actual exchange so it becomes clear that to a large extent, the Straits Times obfuscates the truth and twists it according to the whims of its masters. ...
- by convexset
Howw much, is thatt doooog-gie in the win dow? ("aow, aow!")
The one with the waaaag-gerly taillll!!!
This post is not sponsored by anybody, but by your author's own precious time, special effort, and hard work.
2 HaHaas:
eh jeff u really loser leh.sighz
Anonymous said what???
Thaaank you, "genius"lys from http://forums.hardwarezone.com/showthread.php?t=935540
Give Me a HaHaa!!!
<< Home